The Metropolitan Police has been accused of “a form of institutional corruption” for concealing or denying failings over the unsolved murder of private investigator Daniel Morgan.

A report by an independent panel said the force’s first objective was to “protect itself” for failing to acknowledge its many failings, since the Welsh private detective's murder, the panel’s chairman Baroness Nuala O’Loan said.

Mr Morgan, who grew up in Cwmbran, was killed with an axe in the car park of the Golden Lion pub in Sydenham, south-east London, on March 10 1987.

Despite five police inquiries and an inquest, no one has been brought to justice over the father-of-two’s death, with the Metropolitan Police admitting corruption had hampered the original murder investigation.

The Met owes Mr Morgan’s family, and the public, an apology for not confronting its systemic failings and those of individual officers, the report said.

In a statement through their lawyer, the family of Mr Morgan said:

“We welcome the recognition that we – and the public at large – have been failed over the decades by a culture of corruption and cover up in the Metropolitan Police, an institutionalised corruption that has permeated successive regimes in the Metropolitan Police and beyond to this day.”

Home Secretary Priti Patel, who had last month been accused of delaying publication of the report, described the Daniel Morgan case as “one of the most devastating episodes in the history of the Metropolitan Police”.

She told MPs: “The report accuses the Metropolitan Police of a form of institutional corruption.

“Police corruption is a betrayal of everything policing stands for in this country. It erodes public confidence in our entire criminal justice system. It undermines democracy and civilised society.

“We look to the police to protect us and so they are invested with great power.”

Ms Patel added that the “overwhelming majority” of officers use this power honourably, but criticised those who do “terrible harm” by misusing it or who “indulge cover-up or ignore corruption”.

The independent panel’s report, which runs to more than 1,200 pages, expressed concern that within the Met “a culture still exists that inhibits both organisational and individual accountability”.

It found:

“The family of Daniel Morgan suffered grievously as a consequence of the failure to bring his family to justice, the unwarranted assurances which they were given, the misinformation which was put into the public domain, and the denial of failings in investigation, including failing to acknowledge professional competence, individuals’ venal behaviour, and managerial and organisational failures.


“The Metropolitan Police also repeatedly failed to take a fresh, thorough and critical look at past failings."

The initial investigation into Mr Morgan’s death was heavily criticised, with the murder scene not searched and left unguarded, and no alibis sought for all the suspects.

A later probe by Hampshire Police, brought in to investigate amid fears of corruption, was compromised when a senior Met officer was appointed to work with the team, the report said.

The current Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Dame Cressida Dick, was criticised for her refusal to allow the panel team access to the HOLMES police data system.

The report said: “The Metropolitan Police’s lack of candour manifested itself in the hurdles placed in the path of the Panel, such as (then Assistant Commissioner) Cressida Dick’s initial refusal to recognise the necessity for the Panel to have access to the HOLMES system.”

The home secretary said she has written to Dame Cressida Dick, to ask her to provide  detailed responses into the panel’s recommendations for the Metropolitan Police, and the wider issues outlined within the report.

She also said there were questions the about the ability of the Independent Office for Police Conduct watchdog to hold police to account.

Ms Patel added: “I am therefore announcing today that I am bringing forward the next periodic review of the IOPC to start this summer. This will include an assessment of the IOPC’s effectiveness and efficiency.

The brother of Daniel Morgan said Dick should “absolutely” be considering her position in light of the report.

Alastair Morgan was asked whether Ms Dick should consider resigning. He responded: “Absolutely she should.”

The family’s solicitor Raju Bhatt added: “You heard from the panel that the institutionalised corruption that they found is a current problem in the present tense.

“The current leadership in the Met has to take responsibility for that continuing.”

The Met said in a brief statement: “We deeply regret our failure to bring those who murdered Daniel Morgan to justice.”

It said it was considering the report and would “respond in more detail”.

If you value The National's journalism, help grow our team of reporters by becoming a subscriber.