THE chairman of a Milton Keynes-based firm that owns nightclubs across Wales has complained the sector is is being “picked on again” after the Welsh Government’s decision to close clubs ahead of New Year’s Eve

Peter Marks the chairman of Rekom UK, which owns three nightclubs in Wales, called the move “a virtue signalling political decision” and said it was “not based on any semblance of fact”.

He said clubs were victims of the "bully boys".

Rekom UK expects to lose at least £200,000 from the closure of nightclubs Atik, Pryzm, Fiction in Wrexham, Cardiff, and Swansea, after first minister Mark Drakeford announced the measure alongside the reintroduction of social distancing, barriers and one-way systems in businesses from December 27.

The 61-year-old, who has been working in the nightclub sector for 40 years, told the PA news agency: “We thought we’d done enough not to be picked on again, like some weakling in the playground, but once again the bully boys have moved in and started kicking us… I’m beyond angry.”

A £60 million support package for businesses affected by the new restrictions has been announced, with more detail still to come on how funds can be claimed.

But the Welsh Government has said it hasn't got the funds to directly support staff who will be unable to work and earn due to the shutdown.

Mr Marks has argued the Welsh Government support will not be enough to cover the loss of income suffered by his night clubs and others in Wales.

“When businesses close, they need to cover their fixed costs and they need their labour to be covered in furlough,” he told PA.

“But our fixed cost is 20 per cent of our income and our furlough costs would be another 30 per cent on top if we don’t get furloughed support.

“The £60 million promised would go absolutely nowhere, unless they put the whole thing into nightclubs only.”

Mr Marks said that his three venues in Wales alone will lose around £200,000 on New Year’s Eve but warned that the loss will be “vastly more” if restrictions continue in the following months.

He added that self-employed workers, including door staff, DJs and musicians, will be hit hard during the closures.

“If we don’t get proper furlough support, and I mean proper furlough support not something that appears generous but isn’t, then these people can’t get paid without us going bust,” he said.

READ MORE:

Self-employed DJ Hywel Ricketts, who has worked in Cardiff for 30 years, said the decision to close nightclubs will leave him without money that “helps to keep food on the table and a roof over my head”.

The 47-year-old told the PA news agency: “On one of the busiest nights of the year, this will have a detrimental effect on my cash flow.”

Mr Ricketts, who currently DJs for bars Barocco and The Bootlegger in Cardiff, said the measures “will be even harder for the younger DJs who are just starting”.

He claimed the closures are “nothing more than the Welsh Government trying to be different for the sake of it”.

In England, nightclubs are still allowed to remain open but require proof of double-vaccination or a negative PCR or lateral flow test result within the last 48 hours for those attending some venues.

Mr Marks said he would rather have Covid passports than be forced to close but said the measure could still put people off going to nightclubs.

He said: “I would rather not be singled out as the only premises to have Covid passports because what that does is it perpetuates the myth that nightclubs are a particularly odious and a bad problem, which does no good for consumer confidence.”

Responding to journalists’ questions on Friday, Mr Drakeford said closing nightclubs aims to protect people at risk of catching Covid-19.

He said: “If you look at London, and you look to see where the most rapid growth has been in the Omicron variant, it has been people in their 20s and their 30s.

“While I’m always keen to think carefully about the differential impact that decisions have on different parts of the population, in this case I think you could say that we are discriminating in favour of younger people by taking action in a context where they are most likely to go, against the background of information about the way in which Omicron spreads.”

If you value our journalism, please support The National by becoming a subscriber.